How science can end moral philosophy’s dependence on personal perceptions

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Moral philosophy often makes use of personal perceptions of moral intuitions and durable well-being (or happiness or flourishing) to judge the worth of foundational moral premises such as those underlying Utilitarianism, egoism, and virtue ethics. For John Rawls’ “reflective equilibrium … Continue reading

A conjecture explaining moral philosophy and science’s miscommunications

Gallery

This gallery contains 3 photos.

For over 2500 years, moral philosophers have focused on normative ideas about what people ought to do. Normative ideas are about whatever (if anything) is actually right or wrong, which may be independent of the values or cultural moral standards … Continue reading

The science of morality is religion’s servant, not its master, on moral matters

Gallery

This gallery contains 2 photos.

Religious people may object to the idea that morality is an evolutionary adaptation on the grounds that accepting that science would mean surrendering morality to science. However, the science of morality is about means to ends, not ends themselves. Science … Continue reading

Many useful comments on my poster at the Evolution of Morality Conference!

Gallery

This gallery contains 2 photos.

I received many useful comments on my poster summary of the cultural utility of my proposed universal moral principle “Evolutionarily moral acts are altruistic acts that also increase the benefits of cooperation in groups”. No one admitted to thinking my … Continue reading

The evidence for at least one moral universal

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

The diversity, contradictions, and bizarreness of past and present enforced moral standards (cultural norms whose violators are commonly considered to deserve punishment, though sometimes only mild social disapproval) has commonly been considered obvious evidence that “There are no moral universals!”. … Continue reading

Jonathon Haidt’s New Book “The Righteous Mind” and Why We Ought to Talk to the Elephant

Gallery

This gallery contains 1 photo.

Imagine an emotional, highly willful elephant (representing our biology based moral intuitions, or, as David Hume might have called them, our moral passions) with a much less powerful rider, the rational part of human consciousness. This is Jonathon Haidt’s key … Continue reading